【chouse】另外的代价

Jan. 26th, 2026 04:20 pm
[syndicated profile] house_chase_ao3_feed

Posted by RabbitSleeping

by

Chase同意帮House做手术,但是前老板得拿出点诚意来

🚗 s5e17背景

*设定起司是cuntboy
*涉及舔穴、指奸

Words: 1665, Chapters: 1/1, Language: 中文-普通话 國語

cimorene: A drawing of a person in red leaving a line of blue footprints in white snow (winter)
[personal profile] cimorene
So far, this appears to be a quite mild case of shingles, from what I've been able to gather. It's annoying and worrying, but it hasn't become more than slightly and intermittently painful. I'm not sure if I'm extraordinarily lucky, or if I'm just young enough to make mild symptoms much more likely. We are also having a cold snap again, though it's not really all that cold, only a little bit below the freezing point and a little bit more snow.
[syndicated profile] thedrawplay_feed

Posted by DrawPlayDave

THE WEEK IN CHAOS

Bad weather brings out a particular divide amongst fans. The Purist, and the Chaos..ist? Better represented as the Domers and the Anti-Domers. Purists, or Domers, want their football as pure strain as possible. They want every game to be Fox only, No Items, Final Destination. No additional factors, as minimal chaotic elements as can be, to make sure that the game played is as pure strain football as possible. That’s why they call for every game to be in a climate controlled dome and get really upset when bad weather rolls in, and makes the football “bad”. These individuals tend to be statistics enthusiasts, data nerds, and hardcore film analysts. It makes sense, these people watch and judge their football based on these data points and factors, and stuff like inclement weather introduces a lot of unknowns you cannot account for or properly judge. Dorks hate variables.

Then there are people like me, who would rather play on one of the stupid smash levels with items turned up to max because that’s way more fun. Does it mean external factors have more effect on the game and maybe not give us the best possible ball? Sure, but that’s part of the fun. By Football Quality standards, Pats/Boncos sucked. As a spectacle of entertainment, I had a great time. You’ll never get pure strain football for a number of reasons and part of being great is handling all kinds of adverse elements. You couldn’t tell what yard line the plays were on. The Patriots uniforms vanished into the snow like the wind. Kicks flew all over the place. Players slipped like cartoon characters. You aren’t going to convince me that wasn’t fun to watch. I’ve seen a lot of boring or bad games happen in ideal controlled conditions. I think I’ve always enjoyed when the weather adds that additional stupid factor. Plus, let’s be honest: the snow didn’t start until the middle third quarter, and the game was quite stinky well before then.

The real chaos factor that ruined this game was Jarrett Stidham, which we were stuck with either way. I think the Broncos win this game with Nix. The Patriots fell back on what has worked in the previous two playoff games: pressure the QB and wait for them to fuck up. It worked again. Stidham beat them on a deep ball early but the Pats locked in and Stidham’s inexperience was on display. Indecisiveness and panic set in, and the Patriots functionally won when Stidham made his big mistake before halftime, giving the Pats the ball in the redzone. The Broncos going for it on 4th early with a very stupid play also may have cost Denver the game later on, because they never scored again after that first TD. Once the weather turned the Patriots managed to run the ball better than Denver, and that was all they needed. The Patriots are back. All of those kindergarteners who have never seen a Super Bowl must be thrilled.

Our second game had more scoring, if you need that to feel alive. It was a thrilling back-and-forth with both teams balling out on offense, making you kinda forget these teams are supposed to have good defenses. Seattle looked to take off early but the Rams mostly kept pace, nipping just at their heels anytime Seattle pulled ahead further. Eventually though it just wasn’t enough. A bad mistake by the Rams special teams gave Seattle a big scoring opportunity, and a tough Seattle stop on 4th down with 3 minutes left and subsequent clock eating drive by the Hawks left the Rams with no time for miracles.

CHAOS OF THE WEEK
Jarrett Stidham effectively lost the game on one extremely stupid mistake. 

CHAOTIC MOMENTS OF THE WEEK
Look at this juke by Kenneth Walker
What a biff by the Rams punt returner

THE VIBE CHECK
-Obviously for this particular matchup, both teams vibes are high. But what about everyone watching them?

The Super Bowl is in Levi’s. 49er fans have to watch the Seahawks or Patriots win in their building. Rancid vibes. Jets fans have to watch the Patriots or Sam Darnold win. Rancid vibes. I’m sure the Vikings fans are having a good time watching Sammy reach the Super Bowl while NINE steps on legos in the locker room.

The Chargers fired Roman and possibly hired Mike McDaniel (should he not take a HC job). That’s an upgrade! The Steelers hired Mike McCarthy! That’s rough buddy! The Bills are imploding in spectacular fashion! Oh no! The Eagles fired Patullo, good! The Packers hired Gannon as DC to replace the Dolphins hiring Haftley…okay? The Falcons hired Stefanski…great! Falcons fans are unhappy about it but I think that’s a good hire. The Harbaugh hire has Giants fans extremely optimistic. The Lions replaced their OC with Drew Petzig, and the fans are…displeased. They could have had McDaniel and they chose this guy? Why?

The Raiders are going to get cornball supreme Mendoza as their QB, but we don’t know who he is playing for yet. The Ravens hired Chargers DC Jesse Minter. Good pick, imo. Ravens need to shore up the defense, the offense is in better shape. The Titans picked Robert Saleh. I like Saleh and I think his Jets chance got derailed for the Annoying One, but I don’t think this was a good fit.

The Browns, Raiders, and Cardinals don’t have a coach yet. One of them will get Kubiak. But it goes to show you these 3 organizations look like bad places to work.

THE NFL HAS AN OFFICIATING PROBLEM of the week
Another Rams NFCCG, another missed DPI? Darnold sails a ball to the sideline and the ball is borderline catchable, but it shouldn’t matter because the Rams guy shoved Shaheed from behind well before the ball arrives. If they ruled that uncatchable despite the ball hitting him in the head with his feet still on the line, that’s horseshit. And to be honest? A ball being uncatchable shouldn’t just allow a defender to hit a WR early anyway. That should have been called. If you commit a flagrant penalty, you commit a penalty, the quality of the throw shouldn’t matter.

Thankfully this time it didn’t have a major impact on the game.

CACKLES OF THE WEEK
SOMEONE CHECK THE FIELD FOR BANANA PEELS

BIG OOF OF THE WEEK
Woolen you fucking idiot. I hate taunting penalties and think this was stupid, but he basically walked to the Rams sideline and practically begged them to throw a flag by jawing at them for too long. The TD throw over him on the next play was a Mortal Kombat brutality.

CHAOS WATCH
I feel like after a year of underestimating and dismissing the Patriots I’ve placed myself in the weird position of being one of the few people who is not automatically dismissing them now. The Patriots absolutely have a chance to win this game. They may not have faced an offense this solid in the playoffs (or even the regular season) yet, but their own defense has done everything they needed to do up to this point. The team is battle-tested against 3 top defenses in the playoffs. They have put severe pressure on all 3 guys so far, and I have no reason to assume they won’t do the same to Darnold. Unironically I think the Rams offense would have been the worse matchup for NE out of the two NFC teams.

Darnold acquitted himself admirably (or should I say Admiraly) against the Rams pressure but pressure still tends to be what hurts him. There’s no guarantee he’s busted every ghost yet, and if the Patriots can disrupt him, that’s a problem.

FRAUD WATCH
I’m done underestimating the Patriots at this point, they deserve to be here. But in the off chance they get throttled in the Super Bowl (I do not think they will), I can tell you exactly what the narrative will be: a soft path through the playoffs because of the offenses they faced. The Chargers, Texans, and Broncos all successfully stymied the Patriots offense well enough to win. But the offenses of all 3 of those teams were shit. The Chargers were very injured on the line and poorly coached, the Texans were poorly coached, injured, and their QB fell apart. The Broncos were forced to start a QB with no experience with shitty weather. If this defense suddenly gets shredded in the Bowl, we’ll know this slate of opponents was a bit illusory.

GIANTS CORNER
Harbaugh is doing pretty much exactly what I was hoping he would: gut the building of all the legacy employees. Arguably the biggest flaw within the Giants organization was the inability to self-evaluate and address festering problems within the team. This is the true value of Harbaugh. He spent years in a functional, effective organization. Now he’s been given free rein to make genuine changes in the building, and he’s doing so.

I don’t know if any of this actually pans out. There’s obviously a chance it doesn’t. It could even get worse. What makes me happy is that the Giants are trying. This would not be happening with Stefanski or McCarthy, or any other new hire. Also Joe Schoen effectively got his ass demoted.

SNUFF FILM OF THE WEEK
Two games this week, both entertaining for different reasons, no snuffs.

DISAPPOINTMENT DUCK
Again, this category doesn’t really work with two games, so I’ll pick a play instead. Sean Payton going for it on 4th down early with a shitty pass outside instead of a run up the middle or taking the 3 points may have cost them the game.

MOST UNWATCHABLE TEAM OF THE WEEK
Either offense in Denver/New England. Can’t even blame the snow, that shit sucked before it arrived.

CARTOONS!


————————————————————

DA SUPABOWL

PATRIOTS vs SEAHAWKS

We got two weeks to discuss it but I am also of the belief this is Seattle’s game to lose. I do not think Seattle is going to have an easy time of it, and I think the Patriots offense will do better than they did against Houston or Denver. The weather was bad in both of those games and the Rams performed well enough against Seattle’s D too.

The biggest and most important question here is the Patriots defense facing an offense with actual scoring ability. They got away with some weak offenses so far. I think the Pats offense can do well enough to keep pace with Seattle…if they can mostly hold Seattle down. If the Seahawks can move the ball on this Pats (especially on the ground) the Patriots are in trouble.

Drake Maye is the truth and the Patriots coaching staff is brilliant and experienced. I give them the edge there. Drake’s inexperience and general lack of production in the playoffs thus far is a concern though. Darnold didn’t need to do much against the 49ers, but he balled out against LA. They’ve also had more experience with Levi’s Stadium, as minor as that is.

This matchup in general makes me groan, I didn’t want to see either of these teams nor have them face each other, but I am genuinely excited for the game and I think it has the potential to be pretty good. I think the Seahawks are just a bit too powerful and win something like 34-28, with most of the scoring coming in the second half after a low-scoring first half.

 

I do not have ideas for the two bets yet, so feel free to request anything.

The post CHAMPIONSHIP CHAOS REPORT: WEATHER IS FUN appeared first on The Draw Play.

Oh, God

Jan. 24th, 2026 02:27 pm
[syndicated profile] house_chase_ao3_feed

Posted by slimypaws

by

Chase forgets his phone which is still loaded onto the last porn page where the actors look a bit too much like him and House. It all spirals from there.

Words: 6323, Chapters: 1/1, Language: English

【大谷翔平×你】刺青

Jan. 26th, 2026 04:01 am
[syndicated profile] baseball_rpf_ao3_feed

Posted by Gloria99

by

圈地自萌了不要骂我,一切以他单身为前提。作者很脆弱,受不了乙女向麻烦不要看直接关掉,非常感谢。
预警:一夜情,偶像×粉丝,都是自愿的没有强迫性行为。如果都可以的话感谢观看。

Words: 3148, Chapters: 1/1, Language: 中文-普通话 國語

Poetry, by George MacDonald

Jan. 25th, 2026 11:54 pm
[syndicated profile] standardebooks_new_feed
A collection of poetry by Scottish author, poet, and Christian minister George MacDonald, exploring themes of faith, nature, redemption, and the human soul.

Puppet

Jan. 25th, 2026 09:41 pm
[syndicated profile] baseball_rpf_ao3_feed

Posted by marchanmania

by

The Phillies are winning by just one run. A man on second base, and a strong hitter at the plate. One out to end the inning, that’s it.

Rafael Marchán has a great read on this hitter, and he knows exactly what pitch to call. But Jesús shakes him off. Again, and again, and again.

One useless mound visit later, a towering home run is flying over their heads, certainly no doubt about it.

Now, the Phillies are trailing because Jesús is stupid, and didn’t listen to his boyfriend. And he certainly has some amends to make with him when they get home.

Words: 5363, Chapters: 1/1, Language: English

Meh

Jan. 25th, 2026 05:04 pm
[syndicated profile] daringfireballfeed_feed

Posted by John Gruber

My thanks to Meh for sponsoring last week at DF. Meh puts up a new deal every day, and they do it with panache. As they say, “It’s actual, real, weird shit you didn’t know existed for half the price you would’ve guessed.”

Don’t tell any of my other sponsors, but Meh is my favorite longtime DF sponsor. I love the way their orange graphics look against DF’s #4a525a background. And I always love their sponsored posts that go into the RSS feed at the start of the sponsorship week. I’ll just quote theirs from this week in full:

Everything sucks. The whole world’s going to shit, especially our part of it, and it can feel like anything fun or silly is sticking your head in the sand.

And yet. It doesn’t help to just be miserable. If you’re going to last, you’ve got to find your little moments of joy, or as a break from the misery.

Buying our crap at Meh is not how you solve the world’s problems. We’re not that crass. But maybe a minute a day of reading our little write-up, and a couple minutes of catching up with the Meh community, of making a few new online friends, and yes, of occasionally picking up a weird gadget or strange snack you’ve never heard of is just a few minutes you get to take a break, not giving in to how bad everything else is.

Of course we would say that. Of course we benefit from that. But it is also part of why we have a quirky write-up. Why we have a community. Why we’re selling whatever weird thing is over at Meh today.

His butler was too formidable

Jan. 25th, 2026 02:33 pm
cimorene: A woman sitting on a bench reading a book in front of a symmetrical opulent white-and-gold hotel room (studying)
[personal profile] cimorene
The Powerhouse by John Buchan is a 1916 thriller mystery about an international secret criminal organization that's absolutely laughable in light of (1) the later course of history and (2) the development of the genre. Readable, pleasant narration, and quite a turn of phrase, but insubstantial.

The Patient in Room 18 by Mignon G. Eberhart is set in a private hospital in the American Midwest in 1929, and that made it interesting at first. It has some gobsmacking passages that it doesn't seem to know are racist ("This other guy was obviously wrong to be prejudiced against this mixed race woman but she is obviously fashionable and lazy because of her Black ancestry" - the enlightened detective). The plot relies on a witness to the first murder waiting a week, then deciding to spill his guts to the narrator in a clump of bushes where anybody could overhear, then refusing to say who did it and running away to get murdered while the narrator is just like "Huh!"

Correspondencia

Jan. 25th, 2026 07:06 am
[syndicated profile] little_women_ao3_feed

Posted by Rypay

by

Mientras el campus entero se ahoga en el cansancio de escuchar las glorias de Jo March, un impostor descubre que no se puede falsificar el amor cuando ya es correspondido.

Words: 1710, Chapters: 1/1, Language: Español

This quarter of our lives

Jan. 25th, 2026 05:51 am
[syndicated profile] nfl_rpf_ao3_feed

Posted by ew114daphne

by

Joe Burrow had his heart broken by bff J Chase but he’s more focused on his nfl career. Justin Herbert definitely likes women but also maybe Joe Burrow if the opportunity presents itself.

Words: 2758, Chapters: 1/1, Language: English

土拨鼠之日(仮)

Jan. 25th, 2026 05:17 am
[syndicated profile] baseball_rpf_ao3_feed

Posted by Racine

by

*LAD17/LAD18、LAD16/LAD18,斜线有意义
*大纲文,来自@@DKKKKKKLL的脑洞,只是我不会写(这么诡异的东西请自行避雷
*真的是随便写的

Words: 2776, Chapters: 1/?, Language: 中文-普通话 國語

[syndicated profile] daringfireballfeed_feed

Posted by John Gruber

A few weeks ago there were a rash of stories claiming that iOS 26 is seeing bizarrely low adoption rates from iPhone users. The methodology behind these numbers is broken and the numbers are totally wrong. Those false numbers are so low, so jarringly different from previous years, that it boggles my mind that they didn’t raise a red flag for anyone who took a moment to consider them.

The ball started rolling with this post from Ed Hardy at Cult of Mac on January 8, “iOS 26 Still Struggles to Gain Traction With iPhone Users”, which began:

Only a tiny percentage of iPhone users have installed iOS 26, according to data from a web analytics service. The adoption rate is far less than previous iOS versions at this same point months after their releases. The data only reveals how few iPhone users run Apple’s latest operating system upgrade, not why they’ve chosen to avoid it. But the most likely candidate is the new Liquid Glass look of the update. [...]

Roughly four months after launching in mid-September, only about 15% of iPhone users have some version of the new operating system installed. That’s according to data for January 2026 from StatCounter. Instead, most users hold onto previous versions.

For comparison, in January 2025, about 63% of iPhone users had some iOS 18 version installed. So after roughly the same amount of time, the adoption rate of Apple [sic] newest OS was about four times higher.

Those links point to Statcounter, a web analytics service. A lot of websites include Statcounter’s analytics tracker, and Statcounter’s tracker attempts to determine the version of the OS each visitor’s device is running. The problem is, starting with Safari 26 — the version that ships with iOS 26 — Safari changed how it reports its user agent string. From the WebKit blog, “WebKit Features in Safari 26.0”:

Also, now in Safari on iOS, iPadOS, and visionOS 26 the user agent string no longer lists the current version of the operating system. Safari 18.6 on iOS has a UA string of:

Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 18_6 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/18.6 Mobile/15E148 Safari/604.1

And Safari 26.0 on iOS has a UA string of:

Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 18_6 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/26.0 Mobile/15E148 Safari/604.1

This matches the long-standing behavior on macOS, where the user agent string for Safari 26.0 is:

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/26.0 Safari/605.1.15

It was back in 2017 when Safari on Mac first started freezing the Mac OS string. Now the behavior on iOS, iPadOS, and visionOS does the same in order to minimize compatibility issues. The WebKit and Safari version number portions of the string will continue to change with each release.

In other words, Safari now reports, in its user agent string, that it’s running on iOS 18.6 when it is running on iOS 18.6, and reports that it’s running on iOS 18.6 when it’s running on iOS 26.0 or later. And it’s going to keep reporting that it’s running on iOS 18.6 forever, just like how Safari 26 on MacOS reports that it’s running on MacOS 10.15 Catalina, from 2019.

Statcounter completely dropped the ball on this change, and it explains the entirety of this false narrative that iOS 26 adoption is incredibly low. (Statcounter has a “detect” page where you can see what browser and OS it thinks you’re using.) The reason they reported that 15 percent of iPhone users were using iOS 26 is probably because that’s the amount of web traffic Statcounter sees from iOS 26 web browsers that aren’t Safari (most of which, I’ll bet, are in-app browser views in social media apps).

Nick Heer, at Pixel Envy, wrote a good piece delving into this saga. And then he posted a follow-up item pointing out that (a) Statcounter’s CEO has acknowledged their error and they’re fixing it; and (b) Wikimedia publishes network-wide stats that serve as a good baseline. The audience for Wikipedia is, effectively, the audience for the web itself. And Wikipedia’s stats show that while iOS 26 adoption, in January 2026, isn’t absurdly low (as Statcounter had been suggesting, erroneously, and writers like Ed Hardy at Cult of Mac and David Price at Macworld foolishly regurgitated, no matter how little sense it made that the numbers would be that low), they are in fact lower than those for iOS 18 a year ago and iOS 17 two years ago. Per Wikimedia:

  • iOS 26, January 2026: 50%
  • iOS 18, January 2025: 72%
  • iOS 17, January 2024: 65%

So, no, iOS 26 adoption isn’t at just 15 percent, which only a dope would believe, but it’s not as high as previous iOS versions in previous years at this point on the calendar. Something, obviously, is going on.

David Smith, developer of popular apps like Widgetsmith and Pedometer++, on Mastodon:

I noticed iOS 26 adoption had entered a ‘third wave’ of rapid adoption. So I made a graph of the relative adoption versus iOS 18 at this point in the release cycle.

While lower than iOS 18 at this point for my apps (65% vs. 78%), the shape of this graph says to me that Apple is in full control of the adoption rate and can tune it to their plans. The coordinated surges are Apple dialing up automatic updates.

If this surge were as long as previous ones, we’d hit the saturation point very soon.

Chart of iOS 26 vs. iOS 18 adoption, day-by-day after each version was released.

What’s going on, quite obviously, is that Apple itself is slow-rolling the automatic updates to iOS 26. For years now Apple has steered users, via default suggestions during device setup, to adopt settings to allow OS updates to happen automatically, including updates to major new versions. Apple tends not to push these automatic updates to major new versions of iOS until two months after the .0 release in September. This year that second wave was delayed by about two weeks, and there’s now a third wave starting midway through January. It’s a different pattern from previous years — but it’s a pattern Apple controls. A large majority of users of all Apple devices get major OS updates when, and only when, their devices automatically update. Apple has been slower to push those updates to iOS 26 than they have been for previous iOS updates in recent years. With good reason! iOS 26 is a more significant — and buggier — update than iOS 18 and 17 were.

People like you, readers of Daring Fireball, may well be hesitant to update to iOS 26, or (like me) to MacOS 26, or to any of the version 26 OS updates, because you are aware of things (like UI changes) that you are loath to adopt.

But the overwhelming majority of Apple users — especially iPhone users — just let their devices update automatically. They might like iOS 26’s changes, they might dislike them, or they might not care or even notice. But they just let their software updates happen automatically — and they will form the entirety of their opinions regarding iOS 26 after it’s running on their iPhones.

[syndicated profile] popehat_feed

Posted by Ken White

Advocating the moral propriety or even moral necessity of a resort to force and violence is protected by the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America. Noto v. United States, 367 U.S. 290, 298 (1961).

You know, for whatever that’s worth these days.

With that in mind: what are the best moral arguments against political violence in America?

By political violence, I mean violence aimed at stopping or changing a particular political circumstance, such as the rule of one group of persons over another, and not privileged by traditional legal norms like self-defense.

I mean to ask this question in a particular set of set of circumstances.

Typical Circumstances Discouraging Violence in America

Typically, America has enjoyed a set of circumstances discouraging political violence.1 Those circumstances include:

  • A reasonably broad consensus that everyone gets a voice in how society is run, even if we don’t agree with other people’s choices.

  • People in power generally acknowledging that everyone gets a voice in how society is run, even if they aren’t always sincere.

  • A consensus that a reasonably broad range of dissent is legitimate, even if foolish or misguided.

  • Limits on using the mechanisms of government to punish political minorities.

  • A legal system that puts at least some plausible limits on people with power and holds powerful people accountable, at least on occasion.

  • A legal system that imposes consequences for sufficiently clear abuses of the rights of normal people, at least on occasion.

  • People in power acknowledging and obeying the legal system’s rulings even when they disagree with them.

  • People in power acknowledging laws as legitimate restrictions on their right to do things, and acknowledging they must be changed through the legal system or by new laws.

  • Rights being broadly understood to apply to everyone regardless of political affiliation.

  • Taboos against overt and conspicuous lying shared by people in power and a sufficiently broad portion of the populace.

  • A factual understanding of realty shared by a sufficiently broad group of Americans, involving institutions viewed as reliable sources of information by a sufficiently broad group of Americans.

  • A set of institutions — media, academic, or otherwise — willing and capable of distinguishing truth from falsehood and identifying the difference in a forthright manner.

  • A sufficiently broad consensus that even people we dislike are human beings with rights.

  • Political norms encouraging treating political opponents as human beings with different views of how to achieve shared goals.

A Set Of Circumstances Not Discouraging Violence In America

Now, if you possibly can, imagine a very different set of circumstances in America2 :

  • A widespread belief, voiced by leaders of a ruling party and shared by their followers, that political participation by the political minority is inherently illegitimate and should be investigated, officially discouraged, diluted, and otherwise suppressed by law.

  • Leaders of a ruling party commonly asserting that the political minority should not only be outvoted, but should not have a voice in politics.

  • A ruling party and its followers that treat dissent as presumptively illegitimate and as justification for official punishment, prosecution, and violence, such as by using the term “terrorist” to label persons monitoring government use of force.

  • A ruling party and its followers that use the power of government to punish political minorities, such as through depriving states of federal funding if they do not vote for the ruling party.

  • A legal system that is increasingly unwilling or unable to place limits on the ruling party or its leaders, in part because the ruling party has coopted the Supreme Court.

  • A legal system that refuses to impose consequences for abuses of the rights of normal people, no matter how severe, because the ruling party will not prosecute those people and the ruling party’s supporters in the legal system obstruct any such prosecution, and because the ruling party will use the power of pardon to protect its supporters from consequences of abusing the rights of others.

  • A ruling party that treats rulings against it as inherently illegitimate and grounds for impeachment or other punishment.

  • A ruling party that treats laws, regulations, and other limits on its power as inherently illegitimate, supported by the most senior coopted members of the legal system, who prevent more junior members of the legal system from requiring the ruling party to abide by the rule of law.

  • A ruling party and its supporters treating rights as contingent on political affiliation, where equivalent speech is either protected or criminal depending on the political affiliation of the speaker, and where carrying a firearm is either sacrosanct or grounds for the state to use immediately deadly force against you.

  • A culture that celebrates overt and obvious lying as a sign of masculinity, authority, and patriotism, governed by a ruling party that openly brags that it tells despicable lies about ethnic groups to divert political discussion to its chosen topics.

  • A complete lack of shared reality and a complete lack of institutions supported by a shared consensus of belief.

  • A national media unable or unwilling to identify these circumstances clearly, and unable or unwilling to articulate what statements are true and what statements are false, crippled by a fatuous norm that requires treating both sides of any dispute as equally legitimate.

  • A ruling party that identifies many categories of Americans as less than human, without human dignity and having no rights, supported in that view by a substantial portion of Americans.

  • A ruling party that identifies anyone disagreeing as being less than human and as being devoted to destroying America as opposed to having different views of how to govern America, supported by a substantial portion of Americans who share that view.

That set of circumstances has a set of arguably predictable consequences:

  • Members of groups hated by the ruling party and its supporters — including racial and religious groups, immigrants, and dissenters or critics — can be assaulted and even murdered with practical impunity, both by government actors and by private individuals favored by the ruling party.

  • The ruling party can lie to justify said assaults and murders and no reliable institution can call the lies to account.

  • The ruling party can expand the hated group without rights at will.

  • The constitutional and statutory rights of the hated groups can be violated at will.

  • Anyone objecting can be punished by violence or by abuse of government power.

  • The populace is increasingly confused and uninformed because the institutions that should inform them are unable or unwilling to do so in a coherent manner.

Why Is Political Violence Immoral Under These Circumstances?

So, if we somehow bring ourselves to imagine those circumstances, what are the best moral arguments against resorting to political violence in an effort to resist or change them? Prudence and experience have shown one should consider, careful, the moral arguments about violence before using it, especially in political circumstances.

I’m not asking for practical arguments, like “because they’ll kill you.” I think there is a very good moral argument that is intertwined with practicality: if you try, the ruling party and its supporters will likely use even more unrestrained violence against not just you, but also innocent Americans who have not themselves made the moral choice to join you. In other words, your choice to use violence will likely result in more violence to others. A good criticism of people historically willing to use political violence is that they have been indifferent to that.

No. I am asking, under the set of circumstances I have asked you to imagine, in which the normal deterrents to violence have disappeared and the traditional alternatives to violence have been rendered increasingly futile, what are the best arguments that it would be morally wrong to engage in violence against the people creating this set of circumstances?

The question is probably too general as phrased. Different moral questions apply to different actors. For instance:

  • Armed government agents in the course of using unlawful force against noncombatants, shielded by unlawful impunity for their acts by the ruling party, present the strongest moral argument for political violence.

  • Government agents tasked to use unlawful force and benefiting from the ruling party’s unlawful impunity, but not at this moment using violence, present a different moral question.

  • What about noncombatant government leaders who direct and promote unlawful violence and abuse? I have always had a soft spot for the argument that war would be better if we shot the politicians and generals rather than the privates. What’s the moral argument against that in this circumstance, when the normal political and legal systems for holding them accountable have collapsed?

  • If an advocacy organization says that it is going to use state force to suppress and punish its foes, and says resistance will be met with violence, and the organization does indeed direct and encourage the government to engage in lawless violence, what is the moral argument against using political violence against members of that organization?

  • Say we identify a group of people — perhaps non-citizens — and encourage the nation to view that group with hatred and suspicion, and permit the government to use unlawful violence against that group, and to treat them without regard to legal rights and without any legal procedure, and embark on a program of deliberately expelling those non-citizens to the worst places possible and in ways most likely to cause them harm, in order to discourage other non-citizens from coming to America, and as part of an expressly white nationalist policy. Say we direct particularly despicable violence and abuse towards the most helpless of them, young children. Now say someone wants to add many Americans to that group of non-citizens by dishonest means — say, by bad-faith and dishonest advocacy to eliminate birthright citizenship. The natural and probable consequence if that advocacy succeeds is death, suffering, and deprivation of rights, especially of children, and it may succeed without regard to merit because the ruling party has corrupted legal institutions. What’s the best moral argument against using political violence against the advocates making the bad-faith arguments, under this set of circumstances?

  • Under traditional circumstances, if you call for me to be killed or assaulted or imprisoned without just cause, the chances of that happening are blunted by the set of norms and institutions I described. Under current circumstances, in the absence of those norms and given the impotence of those institutions, when you call for me to be killed or assaulted or imprisoned, what’s the best moral argument against me using violence against you?

No, Really, I’m Asking

These are obviously not new questions, even if the current set of circumstances are new, or seem new. The question of when it’s morally justified to break the law, and when it’s morally justified to use violence, are ancient. But perhaps we don’t ask them as often as we need to, as those before us did when it was their right, their duty, to do so.

I think I have been perfectly clear. However, for the benefit of people easily offended by implication over bluntness, I think there is a plausible argument that it is morally permissible, and even morally necessary, to use political violence against the Trump Administration and its agents and supporters under the current circumstances in America. The arguments in favor are likely to grow.

1  That doesn’t mean those circumstances render political violence immoral, or impossible, or even that they prevent political violence altogether. It doesn’t mean that all Americans have been equally free from political violence, or that all Americans enjoy the benefit of those circumstances, or that some of those circumstances aren’t sometimes illusory. I mean that that set of circumstances makes Americans less open to the argument that political violence could be morally acceptable or even mandatory, because violence seems like an unnecessary and gratuitous.

2  Again, this list is not meant to imply that these circumstances, or ones quite like it, have not previously existed in America, at least for some Americans.

Status

Jan. 24th, 2026 08:31 pm
cimorene: cartoony drawing of a woman's head in profile giving dubious side-eye (Default)
[personal profile] cimorene
I watched the new Agatha Christie's Seven Dials Mystery, and then reread the book, as I had only a slight recollection of it. The visual design and costumes charmed me, but I was baffled by adaptation choices. Then I watched The Residence, which was much better, and visually lovely as well, as expected from Shondaland.

I stopped reading the works of Freeman Wills Crofts - I read all I could find, but there are more that I haven't yet. The guy was quite prolific. Then I finally got around to reading John Dickson Carr's The Hollow Man, the last book I hadn't read on the bookclub list in Wake Up Dead Man. It was... okay. It did not revise my previously unfavorable opinion of JDC as a mystery writer. It's a fun enough and okay read, but it's not satisfying and the tone and style are... weird. I suppose if I want to articulate this better I'll have to read more of his work.

Anyway, I've been reading some other random early mystery novels since then - AEW Mason (pretty good but some Of Its Time issues), GDH Cole (the majority of the narration is by silly characters whose cluelessness the reader is presumably meant to see through, a narrative technique which makes me gnash my teeth), JJ Connington (better but loses major points for extended scenes of a dumb detective being dumb and his smarter boss being even smugger and more secretive about everything than Sherlock Holmes).

I also have experienced a change of heart, not about the NHL - it's still evil and its culture is toxic and most NHL hockey players suck - but about posting the unfinished hockey WIP with all the names changed. I didn't want to do that from 2016 until like, this month, but now I think I would be okay with it, provided I did finish it (I like the bit I have anyway). I can't at all explain why this feeling changed, though. But clearly we've all been able to process quite a bit about the nature of fanfiction with the names changed since the release of Heated Rivalry.

I keep thinking I want to write something about one of these things, but shingles is making it uncomfortable to sit up with the laptop and type and I keep going, "Fuck it, I have a moderately horrible ailment anyway right now, so lying down and resting is virtuous", and crawling into the flannel duvet tent against the radiator with Sipuli. It's nice in there. In fact at times it's so toasty that I forget it's chilly out in the rest of the house.
[syndicated profile] ao3_news_feed

International Volunteer Day

Last November we asked the community to submit questions to our OTW volunteers in celebration of International Volunteer Day. In this series of posts we will spotlight some of our committees' responses.

The Volunteers & Recruiting committee (VolCom) is in charge of inducting, retiring, and placing volunteers on hiatus. They handle personnel records and tool access, as well as assisting with the formation of new committees, subcommittees, and workgroups.

We asked VolCom for replies to your questions, and received a lot of feedback! Below you can find a selection of their answers:

Volunteers & Recruiting Committee Specific Questions

Question: Sometimes I want to help the OTW, and consider applying for a volunteer position like tag wrangling, but I don't have a lot of time to commit. Is there anything I can do sporadically, or without a lot of time per week?
Committee answer:
All of our roles come with a weekly time expectation—when we recruit for a role, we post a position description, it's listed there. For some roles, the time requirement starts at two hours per week, while for others it may be five hours or more. How this time is split up in a week depends a lot on the role.
If you find yourself not having enough time to volunteer, but still want to support the OTW, please take a look at our How You Can Help page.

Question: Since this is a non-profit organization, if I wanted to become a volunteer (for fun and because I care about the work being done here), would I be able to use my time as legitimate service hours? (for highschool for example)
Committee answer:
The OTW is a registered 501(c)(3) non-profit organization in the United States, but whether we are a good fit for legitimate service hours depends on the specific requirements your school/work/etc may have. Our volunteers usually do not volunteer under the name they use at school or at work, but if you are comfortable letting either your Chairs or the Volunteers & Recruiting committee know that name, you can receive a written proof of volunteering. If there are other requirements, e.g. a proof of volunteered hours, we can't guarantee that this will be possible for all roles. If you are considering this option, please reach out to the relevant committee via the contact form to discuss what's possible.

Question: Is there a limit to how many times someone can apply to volunteer and be rejected? How many times should you try before giving up? I've applied at least five or six times to different groups and I'm wondering if I should stop bothering you!
Committee answer:
We do not have a limit for applications to the OTW in general. However, if you've been repeatedly not accepted for a role, chances are that you are not fulfilling the requirements for that role. Additionally, some committees might have their own restrictions (see the recruitment post and/or position description). Please also consider your application quality and whether there are other reasons that might lead to you not being offered a role. You can email us and ask why an application was rejected - it depends on the committee how much feedback they are willing to give, as the goal is not to write the "perfect application". Our roles differ a lot in the skills required, so keep an eye out for other roles that might be better suited for your skill set!

Question: What types of things can be done by volunteers? I say this as someone who'd love to volunteer at some point in the future, but have no idea if I have any skill that would actually be helpful.
Committee answer:
The skill sets required from our volunteers depend a lot on the role: There are roles that require some kind of formal education or in-depth knowledge of a specific topic, such as being a lawyer or a financial analyst. Other roles, however, are teaching all required skills during the training period, for those roles it mostly depends on being the "type" for the role. For us in VolCom, it's more of the latter than the former. For example, our volunteers need to enjoy documentation work and ticking off tasks of to-do lists while being able to do work autonomously. There are many roles in the OTW that look for a specific type of person more than a person with a specific set of skills, or the skills are very transferable: Skills such as project management, navigating tricky interpersonal situations, dividing big-picture goals into actionable items, etc. If you keep an eye on our socials and the news posts, you will see us recruiting regularly. Each role comes with a position description that explains both what the volunteers in this role do, and what is required of applicants, so just watch out for a role that matches your skills and interests!

General Questions

How many hours a week do you spend on your OTW volunteer work?

  • This tends to vary by week as well as by role! As a tag wrangler I used to spend about 3 hours a week on my fandoms, and though it has required some "pruning" of what fandoms I'm working on, most of mine were currently consistent enough that this is a pretty stable amount of time for me. For Volunteers & Recruiting, where I serve as both volunteer and co-chair, the time is a lot more fluid. For volunteer-specific tasks I can go between 5-10 hours a week, and for chair work that's an addition of another 3-5 hours per week. The work done isn't always in solid chunks of time -- I do try to count in the time I have even when I'm just catching up on messages from various other volunteers/committees, but in general that's where I've fallen. (Eevee)
  • I'm a VolCom volunteer and it depends, but I'm mainly spending around 4 to 5 hours minimum working for my committee. It can go from processing inductions or removals or following up on a specific request we've received from an OTW member, which in this case is usually pretty easy, to bigger tasks like running recruitments or reviewing documents. In that last case, I like to take 2 solid hours during every work session to really dive into it. (Kalincka)

How do you manage your volunteer time, and do you do the same thing every day like with a day job?

  • I usually block some time on my weekly calendar to get to it! Usually, I do OTW work in the evening, after I've come back from my day job. I work an 8-4, and I live fairly close to my workplace, which means that commuting doesn't eat up too much of my schedule. There are days when I don't do OTW work, but I always check my emails and Slack multiple times a day to make sure I'm not skipping something urgent. Tasks can vary so even if they're mainly cases, they vary, so I don't find it too repetitive! (Kalincka)
  • I spend at least fifteen minutes every day on volunteering - keeping up with what's happening, seeing if there is anything urgent that needs to be dealt with. Usually, that means I look at my emails and our internal chat platform at least three to four times a day. This is mostly the same every day. I work on cases and on documentation frequently - sometimes that happens spontaneously, sometimes I block time in my personal calendar so I don't end up making other plans. This is not as regular and scheduled as me keeping track of what's going on in the organization and my committee, but it usually happens for a few hours every two to three days.
    I also have the benefit of having a very flexible daytime job and working a lot from home, which means a lot of my work days consist of me doing an hour of my paid job, an hour of OTW work, three hours of paid job, and so on.There are a lot of recurring tasks or categories of tasks, but it's still so many different categories of tasks that it's not getting boring. (corr)

What's your favorite part about volunteering at the OTW?

  • I love meeting other volunteers and learning how the OTW works. I find it super fascinating to learn how such a large organization runs and at the same time meet the people behind the scenes of it all. (Bekyro)
  • Getting to work together with so many people from all over the world who care for so many different fandoms. I have gotten to talk to people from so many countries that I would have never met otherwise. I also think that AO3 (and the whole OTW) defies a world in which value and worth are measured in financial units - we don't get paid, the writers on AO3 and Fanlore don't get paid, the readers don't get paid. Being a part of this awesome project makes me proud and happy. (corr)

What's the aspect of volunteer work with the OTW that you most wish more people knew about?

  • We don't have shareholders or people with financial interests that tell us what to do. We're all regular fandom people who love fandom and want to maintain a place that's a home (an archive) to all transformative works. Sometimes, when I browse through discussions about the OTW, I get the feeling that people don't know that we are not a for-profit company, that we are not making any money, that every wrangled tag, every written news post, every design decision for AO3, every Fanlore policy, all of these things are made by fandom people in their free time. We're doing this not because we want to earn money with AO3 or the other projects, but because we love fandom and are dedicated to the OTW's mission. (corr)
  • There is a lot more to the OTW than AO3! I encourage people to check out Open Doors and the other projects the OTW is holding up, it's worth a look. I know I've learned so much thanks to Fanlore, and I didn't even know that it was OTW volunteers that upheld this platform. (Kalincka)

What does a typical day as an OTW volunteer looks like for you?

  • There's one thing that never changes, and it's checking emails/cases/messages. It's the foundation of my typical day. The tasks in themselves always vary. As a VolCom volunteer I'm pretty sure I do at least one removal per week. (Kalincka)
  • I check my emails and our chat platform multiple times a day to monitor if something urgent comes up - as I get sent an email for every change in our cases, I also keep track of those like that. That's what I do every day. On days that I do active work, I focus either on documentation, training, or handling cases, and spend one to five hours doing that. (corr)

What is your favorite animal? Alternatively, do you have a favorite breed of cat/dog?

  • My favorite animal are sheep! Unfortunately, I don't own any sheep. My favorite breed of cat is trash can kitty, all of the cats I have are the ones nobody at the shelter wanted, and they are the best cats I've ever met (I might be biased). (corr)
  • I would have to say birds, especially parrots. I love Sun conures, but cockatiels are definitely high up there too (if they weren’t, my own would probably peck me) (yes, I am very biased). If we include fantasy creatures, dragons are also at the top (Bekyro)

Do you enjoy reading fanfic? If so, what's your favorite work on AO3?

  • I love reading fanfic! It's the reason I stumbled upon the OTW in the first place. I wouldn't say I've got a single favorite fic in the entire world, but I keep a list. Off the top of my head, and since we're in an end-of-the-year period, I would heavily recommend reading this Klaus fic (formerly titled 'In the name of love'). It warms my heart every time (Kalincka)
  • I do! While I do not have any favorite fic, as I read depending on my mood, I do have a bunch I keep returning to. I’m scared to check how big my collection of fics I reread has gotten nowadays. (Bekyro)

Do you write any fanfic yourself? What do you enjoy about it?

  • I do, even if it's less than I'd like due to lack of time. I have about 350k words published on AO3 and half a million in drafts, which is what I wrote in the last four years.
    I like to get my readers to yell at me. My writer discord is really good at getting upset with me, if I'm not being insulted for hurting their feelings, I didn't do my job right. I am mostly a character-driven writer, and I like to put my characters into situations or make them face negative consequences. I also love to write healing, but I am decidedly not a fluff writer - the things I write as comfort for myself tend to get comments of people saying that I still hurt them. (corr)
  • I do, though ironically not as much since I started volunteering for the OTW. I love expanding on the worlds given to us, doing missing scenes, fixing tragedies from canon, or imagining canon-compliant AUs (I promise, these are possible!). (Eevee)
  • I do not, to the despair of my fic writing friends. Although I may give it a try sometime if the mood strikes. (Bekyro)

What fandoms are you (currently) in?

  • I've not been super active in fandom spaces lately, but the last time I was active was in Haikyuu!! and SK8. Recently I've fallen into a danmei rabbit hole starting with 2ha but I haven't read/written much in it. I also read a lot of bl manhwa/manga! (Eevee)
  • A few years ago, I read this questionable book series called All For The Game by Nora Sakavic, and I have accepted my fate of living in this fandom. I love-hate the books, I love-hate the fandom, and I have found amazing friends in the fandom. Apart from that, I read a lot fandom-blind, as I am looking for specific kinds of stories or tropes. (corr)

Do you feel glad or proud to see fanfiction in your mother tongue?

  • I love that they exist! I think AO3 was one of the first sites where I saw the language I grew up speaking as an option and something about that felt so validating? I don't read in my native language, but I come across them when translations are requested for tags in my native language and I'm always so excited when they show up. (Eevee)
  • While I don’t read any of them myself, I do find it nice knowing they exist. Especially as my native tongue is a smaller one, and it normally tends to drown among the countless bigger languages that exists (Bekyro)

Thanks so much to every volunteer who took the time to answer!

(For more answers, check out this work on AO3, where we collect additional replies to each question!)


The Organization for Transformative Works is the non-profit parent organization of multiple projects including Archive of Our Own, Fanlore, Open Doors, OTW Legal Advocacy, and Transformative Works and Cultures. We are a fan-run, donor-supported organization staffed by volunteers. Find out more about us on our website.

jjhunter: silhouetted woman by winding black road; blank ink tinted with green-blue background (silhouetted JJ by winding road)
[personal profile] jjhunter
Unbreaking Team @ the Unbreaking: This week at Unbreaking, January 16
Beginning in late November and escalating through early January, the Trump administration has sent 3,000 ICE and CBP agents into Minneapolis–St. Paul. For comparison, the “Operation Midway Blitz” surge in Chicago deployed about 300 federal immigration agents. The Chicago metro area’s population is roughly 2.5 times the size of the Twin Cities’, so the Minneapolis–St. Paul operation has sent about 10 times as many enforcers into a much smaller population center.

Kelly Hayes @ Organizing My Thoughts: Choosing Each Other in a Time of Terror
Trump is waging war on our communities, and we don’t need “better training” for our attackers.

Scott Meslow @ the Verge: How much can a city take?
The most heartening thing about this deeply disturbing moment is seeing how consistently and forcefully Minnesotans of all demographics have been pushing back.

Fred Glass @ Jacboin: The Citywide General Strike Has a Rich History in America
In response to the killing of Renee Good and the ICE invasion, the Minneapolis labor movement has issued the nation’s first citywide general strike call in nearly 80 years

Andrea Pitzer @ Degenerate Art: Into the abyss
You can’t reform a concentration camp regime. You have to dismantle it and replace it. We have a thousand ways to do it. And most U.S. citizens—particularly white ones—have the freedom to act, for now, with far less risk than the many people currently targeted.


ETA: Naomi Kritzer @ Will Tell Stories For Food: How To Help if You are Outside Minnesota
If You’d Like to Donate Money
Contact Your Senators/House Rep
Write a Letter to the Editor
Hassle ICE-Supporting Businesses
To Learn More About What’s Going On in Minnesota, Read Minnesotan News Sources
Push Back on Disinformation
Send Words of Encouragement
Get Ready For This Bullshit to Come to You
Talk About Immigration, and Make it Clear You Think It’s GOOD

Profile

mayhap: hennaed hands, writing (Default)
mayhap

January 2026

S M T W T F S
     123
456789 10
11 121314151617
18 192021222324
25 262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 28th, 2026 11:14 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios