mayhap: Holmes and Watson with text whatever remains however improbable (however improbable)
But why is it Sherlock Holmes's birthday (observed), you may be wondering, if you don't already know. This has always been one of my favorite Sherlockian (or Holmesian) deductions, because the evidence is so thin—even for this sort of pseudoscholarship, I mean, and not just generally—and yet so widely accepted, presumably because the convenience of having a date for observation outweighs all other considerations.

The cases for and against this date are summarized thusly in The Annotated Sherlock Holmes by William S. Baring-Gould, one of my bibles since early adolescence:
For the "January 6th" we have the evidence of The Valley of Fear. That interesting case began on January 7th (1888) and we are told that Holmes on the morning of that day "leaned upon his hand, with his untasted breakfast before him…" "Surely it is clear," Mr. Nathan L. Bengis wrote in "What Was the Month?", "that there had been some small jollification the night before in celebration of the Master's birthday, and that his lack of appetite was the result of a hangover?"

Again, Holmes quotes Shakespeare often, but Twelfth Night is the only such play that Holmes quotes twice. Twelfth Night is January 6th; Holmes, then, was especially fond of that play because January 6th was his own birthdate.

[astrological 'evidence' snipped for personal want of interest]

Opposed to the January school of thought, however, is the June school, represented by Messrs. Russell McLauchlin and Rolfe Boswell, who base their case on the emerald tiepin presented to Holmes by Queen Victoria for his successful solution to the theft of the Bruce-Partington submarine plans.

"If the Widow of Winsor took it into her dear, old head to give somebody a precious stone," Mr. McLauchlin wrote ("On the Dating of the Master's Birth"), "there is only one plan of selection that would have occurred to her. She would, of course, choose his birthstone. There is some question about birthstones, to be sure. There are ancient and modern theories. According to the former, the emerald is the birthstone for May. By more modern reckoning, it is the birthstone for June. Which system, so to speak, did Queen Victoria play?"

To this, Mr. Boswell has responded ("A Rare Day in June") that "the Queen, as her subjects well knew, was a stickler for the proprieties. In her day, the agate was first choice for May's birthstone, while the emerald held pride of place for June…On balancing probabilities, it is apparent that the Master was born in June. Can that Rare Day be pinpointed? The reply is in the positive…Sherlock Holmes was born on Saturday, June 17, 1854 [June 17th is Mr. Boswell's date for "The Red-Headed League"]."

But Mr. Bengis has struck a telling counterblow for the January school in "What Was the Month?": "…the only thing we can be sure of…is not that the gem was an emerald, but that it was green. Now the first choice for January…was the garnet. Further research has revealed that there is a somewhat rare variety of garnet, emerald green in color, called uvarovite. If the gem in the tiepin was uvarovite, it was still a garnet and therefore still a January stone, even though it looked like an emerald [to Watson]." (Vol. I, pp. 49-50)

Incidentally, as another January birthday who has never cared for regular garnets—they look like dead rubies—I am intrigued by the existence of emerald-looking garnets, and if I ever found a nice pair of uvarovite earrings I would be tempted to buy them.
mayhap: vintage photo with text how the milk got into the coconut (how the milk got into the coconut)

Happy Epiphany/Twelfth Night/Sherlock Holmes's birthday (Observed)! In honor of the last, and because it was a plot point in last night's episode of Sherlock, I present Dorothy L. Sayers's essay which originally put forth the Hamish Hypothesis. (This post is also available on tumblr.)

Dr. Watson's Christian Name
A Brief Contribution to the Exegetical Literature of Sherlock Holmes

Dorothy L. Sayers

It has always been a matter of astonishment to Dr. Watson's friends, and perhaps of a little malicious amusement to his detractors, to observe that his wife1 apparently did not know her own husband's name. There can be no possible doubt that Watson's first Christian name was John. The name "John H. Watson" appears, conspicuously and in capital letters, on the title page of A Study in Scarlet,2 and it is not for one moment to be supposed that Watson, proudly contemplating the proofs of his first literary venture, would have allowed it to go forth into the world under a name that was not his. Yet in 1891 we find Watson publishing the story of The Man with the Twisted Lip, in the course of which Mrs. Watson addresses him as "James."

Mr. H. W. Bell (Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson, p. 66, n. 2) has been unable to account for this, and despairingly suggests that it is a mere printer's error. "Watson," he remarks, with much truth, "was a very careless reader of proof." But if he had read the proofs at all, this particular error could not have failed to catch his eye. A man's own name is a subject on which he is sensitive; nothing is more exasperating than to be "called out of one's name." Moreover, in December, 1891, Mary Watson was still alive. Tenderly devoted as she was to her husband, she could not have failed to read his stories attentively on publication in the Strand Magazine, and she would have undoubtedly drawn his attention to an error so ridiculous and immediately reflecting on herself. In the month immediately preceding, the Doctor had made another trivial slip in connection with his wife's affairs; he said that during the period of the adventure of The Five Orange Pips Mrs. Watson was visiting her mother. Mrs. Watson, who was of course an orphan, (Sign of Four), evidently took pains to point out this error and see that the careless author made a note of it; for on the publication of the collected Adventures in 1892 the word "mother" is duly corrected to "aunt."3 On such dull matters as dates and historical facts the dear woman would offer no comment, but on any detail affecting her domestic life she would pounce like a tigress. Yet the name "James" was left unaltered in all succeeding editions of the story.

How are we to explain this? )

mayhap: manuscript vine with dragon head (like dragons)
More like Friday fic this week, whoops. Apparently I've mostly been reading other things this week.

British Library, Cotton Domitian viii, Item IV, ff. 70-80: Historia Johannis (3913 words) by longwhitecoats
Chapters: 1/1
Fandom: Sherlock (TV), Sherlock Holmes & Related Fandoms
Rating: Mature
Warnings: Author Chose Not To Use Archive Warnings
Relationships: Sherlock Holmes/John Watson
Characters: Sherlock Holmes, John Watson
Additional Tags: Alternate Universe - Medieval, Writing on Skin, Writing on the Body, Literacy Kink, Multilingual, Footnotes, Epic Love, Literally an epic love, Implied character death - ambiguous, Academia
Summary:

Here follows the first translation of the Historia Johannis, commonly called "The Hermit's Tale."


I knew I was going to love this story when I saw that it had a whole separate column for the footnotes. Actually, the library copies of the canon that I read were laid out like this as well, so maybe I just have a typographical type.
mayhap: Holmes and Watson with text whatever remains however improbable (however improbable)
[livejournal.com profile] alanor_ambre translated my Holmes/Watson story, Mutual Satisfaction, into Russian, and here it is! How awesome is that?

If you happen to speak Russian, you can vote for her in the RSYA contest in the translation category! (If you're more like me, you can go oooh, cool, I see 221-Б in there!)
mayhap: Holmes and Watson with text whatever remains however improbable (however improbable)
[livejournal.com profile] alanor_ambre translated my Holmes/Watson story, Mutual Satisfaction, into Russian, and here it is! How awesome is that?

If you happen to speak Russian, you can vote for her in the RSYA contest in the translation category! (If you're more like me, you can go oooh, cool, I see 221-Б in there!)
mayhap: Holmes and Watson with text whatever remains however improbable (however improbable)
Because I have it and I think that the rest of you should share in my glee and also because it is very short and takes very little typing, because I am lazy.

This was written for "A Tribute to Sherlock Holmes on the Occasion of his 100th Birthday", a BBC radio programme broadcast on 8 January 1954.

The Young Lord Peter Consults Sherlock Holmes )

This text was reprinted in Sayers on Holmes, which has the somewhat dubious distinction of being the slenderest volume I own. However, as I learned absolutely everything I know about scholarly writing from reading all this fabulous Holmesian scholarship at the tender age of 12, and I got it basically for free in Amazon's 4-for-3 promotion, it was well worth it.
mayhap: Holmes and Watson with text whatever remains however improbable (however improbable)
Because I have it and I think that the rest of you should share in my glee and also because it is very short and takes very little typing, because I am lazy.

This was written for "A Tribute to Sherlock Holmes on the Occasion of his 100th Birthday", a BBC radio programme broadcast on 8 January 1954.

The Young Lord Peter Consults Sherlock Holmes )

This text was reprinted in Sayers on Holmes, which has the somewhat dubious distinction of being the slenderest volume I own. However, as I learned absolutely everything I know about scholarly writing from reading all this fabulous Holmesian scholarship at the tender age of 12, and I got it basically for free in Amazon's 4-for-3 promotion, it was well worth it.

Good lord.

Jan. 29th, 2006 09:10 pm
mayhap: hennaed hands, writing (Default)
Just as I was pondering the logistics of a Sherlock Holmes/Lord Peter Wimsey crossover for [livejournal.com profile] nagasvoice, I discover that it's already been done.

By Dorothy L. Sayers, no less.

Although $8 for a book just 66 pages long is not exactly cheap, you can see why I'm simply going to have to have this book.

Good lord.

Jan. 29th, 2006 09:10 pm
mayhap: hennaed hands, writing (Default)
Just as I was pondering the logistics of a Sherlock Holmes/Lord Peter Wimsey crossover for [livejournal.com profile] nagasvoice, I discover that it's already been done.

By Dorothy L. Sayers, no less.

Although $8 for a book just 66 pages long is not exactly cheap, you can see why I'm simply going to have to have this book.
mayhap: Holmes and Watson with text whatever remains however improbable (however improbable)
*claps hands*

Now I can cop to having written this, perhaps the most notable feature of which is that I actually uploaded it from a coffee shop on Baker Street. Yes. How cool am I?

(Don't answer that.)

Holmes/Watson has been my OTP for ages, and so I was thrilled to bits to get to write it and have my recipient enjoy it and have so many other people say such nice things about it and they didn't even complain about the spoiler ) and in short, I am extremely pleased.

Much love and praise goes to [livejournal.com profile] stubbleglitter, who wrote me my incredibly fantastic Nat/Dan. She rocks like a rocking thing.

I also mucked about with my website for a while and made a new title graphic that is utterly daft and not necessarily legible ([livejournal.com profile] satyadasa punned that it was florilegible, but [livejournal.com profile] coercedbynutmeg says not so much), but I love it beyond all reason regardless. The font with the entrancing decorative flourishes is Ardenwood, but when all the flourishes overlap each other since the demo version of Ardenwood didn't have the more normal versions of letters it pretty much just looks silly, so I pieced it together with a similar Gothic font. After all that time spent carefully aligning a zillion different layers, you're going to have an awfully hard time talking me out of it.
mayhap: Holmes and Watson with text whatever remains however improbable (however improbable)
*claps hands*

Now I can cop to having written this, perhaps the most notable feature of which is that I actually uploaded it from a coffee shop on Baker Street. Yes. How cool am I?

(Don't answer that.)

Holmes/Watson has been my OTP for ages, and so I was thrilled to bits to get to write it and have my recipient enjoy it and have so many other people say such nice things about it and they didn't even complain about the spoiler ) and in short, I am extremely pleased.

Much love and praise goes to [livejournal.com profile] stubbleglitter, who wrote me my incredibly fantastic Nat/Dan. She rocks like a rocking thing.

I also mucked about with my website for a while and made a new title graphic that is utterly daft and not necessarily legible ([livejournal.com profile] satyadasa punned that it was florilegible, but [livejournal.com profile] coercedbynutmeg says not so much), but I love it beyond all reason regardless. The font with the entrancing decorative flourishes is Ardenwood, but when all the flourishes overlap each other since the demo version of Ardenwood didn't have the more normal versions of letters it pretty much just looks silly, so I pieced it together with a similar Gothic font. After all that time spent carefully aligning a zillion different layers, you're going to have an awfully hard time talking me out of it.

Profile

mayhap: hennaed hands, writing (Default)
mayhap

January 2026

S M T W T F S
     123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 3rd, 2026 11:21 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios